Transfer Pricing

Arm’s length Principle

Chapter 5
Arm’s length Principle


As mentioned earlier, in the case of uncontrolled transactions market forces normally determine the terms of the commercial and financial relationships. The price in such transactions is called ‘Uncontrolled Price’ and in a tax terminology it is called ‘Arm’s Length Price’.

The Arm’s Length Principle is agreed upon by all the OECD member countries and adopted as an objective guideline for use by multinational companies and tax administrators in cross border taxation.

The principle is embodied under Article 9 of the OECD MC. It's objective is to avoid erosion of the tax base or the transfer of profits to low tax jurisdictions.

Therefore, all transactions between Related Parties would need to be evaluated from an economic and commercial point of view (Comparability analysis) to verify whether the TP between the related parties (Controlled transactions) is equivalent to TP of same/similar transaction undertaken between independent parties (Uncontrolled transactions) in the same/similar circumstances.

As per the proposed Corporate Tax Regime in the UAE, all Related Party transactions and transactions with Connected Persons will need to comply with TP rules and the arm’s length principle as set out in the OECD TP Guidelines.

The ‘Arm’s Length’ principle states that the price agreed in a transaction between two related parties must be the same as the price agreed in a comparable transaction between two unrelated parties.

Guidelines for applying the Arm's-length principle


The OECD provides guidance for applying the arm's- length principle. These guidelines summarised herein below, provide a good understanding of how OECD expects each Person to determine the ALP of the covered transaction. It is recommended to identify the commercial or financial relations between the associated enterprises and the conditions and economically relevant circumstances attached to those, viz:

      The contractual terms of the transaction;

      The functions performed by each of the parties to the transaction, taking into account assets used and risks assumed, including how those functions relate to the wider generation of value by the MNE group to which the parties belong, the circumstances surrounding the transaction, and industry practices (FAR Analysis);

      The characteristics of property transferred or services provided;

      The economic circumstances of the parties and of the market in which the parties operate;

      The business strategies pursued by the parties

 

Further, OECD prescribes steps for analyzing risk in a controlled transaction, in order to accurately delineate the actual transaction with respect to that risk. The same can be summarised as follows:

 

Step 1: Identify economically significant risks with specificity

      Strategic risks or marketplace risks

      Infrastructure or operational risks

      Financial risks

      Transactional risks

      Hazard risks

 

Step 2: Identify the contractual assumption of the specific risk

      Determine whether the contractual assumption of risk is consistent with the conduct and other facts and

      whether the party assuming the risk is exercising control over the risk and has the financial capacity to assume the risk

 

Step 3: Functional analysis in relation to risk

      Perform functional analysis identifying risks and other facts, including conduct of the parties, control functions and risk mitigation functions, and financial capacity to bear risks

 

Step 4: Interpreting steps 1-3

      Whether the associated enterprises follow the contractual terms

      Whether the party assuming risk exercises control over the risk and has the financial capacity to assume the risk

 

Step 5: Allocation of risk

      If the party assuming the risk does not control the risk or does not have the financial capacity to assume the risk, allocate the risk to the group company having the most control and having the financial capacity to assume the risk

 

Step 6: Pricing of the transaction, taking account of the consequences of risk allocation

      The actual transaction as accurately delineated by considering the evidence of all the economically relevant characteristics of the transaction, should then be priced taking into account the financial and other consequences of risk assumption, as appropriately allocated, and appropriately compensating risk management functions.

 

Computing an arm's-length price is a complex task; it requires a lot of groundwork and research. There is a variety of exceptions and set-offs that necessarily have to be applied to the system to provide useful results.


 

Copyright © 2024 Emirates Chartered Accountants Group.